(lesbi.org.ge) |
For a long time in my life I didn’t question my gender. I saw
myself as female, because my body parts were that of a female, and I kind of
just accepted that fact. However, I didn’t really think about that, either. I
never became the ”girly girl” society expected me to become, but on the other
hand, even though I had my tomboy phases, I
never felt as though I was born in a wrong body. But, growing up in a
conservative society, my gender just wasn’t one of the things I believed were possible
to question.
It was first when I
came in contact with the LGBTQ community and organizations and attended some of
the workshops and seminars, that I found myself totally baffled by the question
– ”Which pronoun do you want us to use when we talk about you?”. Everyone else
had their answers ready, they knew who they were, which gender they belonged
to, or if they belonged to one, to begin with. Suddenly, I knew the answer –
I’m female. The skeptical part of my brain questioned that immediately, but
yes, I was and I am female, and I became strangely at peace with that, out of
nowhere. I’m never going to accept the traditional gender roles, whatever that means nowadays, but I realized then that the way I
feel about my gender matches the body I was given. Good to know.
Being the person who isn’t concerned with
gender when it comes to such things as love life, but rather with the
personality, I used to find myself daydreaming about a world where gender
wouldn’t matter as much as it does today. Or wouldn’t exist at all. That way, I
thought, I wouldn’t need to explain “what I am” or how it is possible that I
can be attracted to both a male and a female person at the same time, not to
mention the cases when I was attracted to transgendered people.
(3.bp.blogspot.com) |
Well, one more thing I found out in the LGBTQ community is that,
for one, that abbreviation includes one more letter – I. What that stands for,
one might ask. It stands for intersex(ual),
a term defined by Merriam Webster dictionary as “intermediate
in sexual characters between a typical male and a typical female”[1]. Another,
more detailed definition is found on the website of the Resource Center for Sexual & Gender Diversity at University of California
Santa Barbara, and it states the following:
“Intersex (previously
referred to as hermaphrodite) refers
to a condition in which an individual may have sex chromosomes, anatomy or
physiology that are not socially considered standard for either male or female.
Intersex conditions are often visible at birth, but some develop later during
puberty. There is no single “intersex body;” intersex encompasses a wide
variety of conditions that do not have anything in common other than that they
are deemed “abnormal” by the medical establishment.” [2]
Even though the old
term, hermaphrodite, almost exclusively was related to the body, chromosomes
and genitalia, the term intersexual has become somewhat an umbrella term for both people whose bodies show signs
of both sexes and people who don’t identify with either of the (traditional)
sexes.
This concept is rather close to the one I was daydreaming about and I realized the great potential of the third gender, not only for the intersexual people, but for all of the society. Maybe one day all people will be referred to as the third gender and my long lasting daydream will be fulfilled!
However, in order for this concept to first be fully recognized and accepted by the society, some big changes are needed. One of them is the language, or to be exact – the introduction of gender neutral pronouns.
This concept is rather close to the one I was daydreaming about and I realized the great potential of the third gender, not only for the intersexual people, but for all of the society. Maybe one day all people will be referred to as the third gender and my long lasting daydream will be fulfilled!
However, in order for this concept to first be fully recognized and accepted by the society, some big changes are needed. One of them is the language, or to be exact – the introduction of gender neutral pronouns.
(mydoorsign.com) |
Not all languages, unfortunately, are flexible in the same degree, so I’m
afraid that some of them might never introduce these pronouns. On the other
hand, there are some of them (and some societies[3], as well) who have shown
to be quite progressive. While English offers a couple of solutions[4], ze/zie and they being the
most used ones, some of the Scandinavian languages seem to have found a way to
introduce these pronouns without having to change the existing language systems
to a greater extent. In Swedish, this pronoun is hen with forms hens/hen or
henom, while in Norwegian, even though the debate is still not settled, it’s
possible to hear both the Swedish variant and the Norwegian one – hin. Den and en can also be used in both languages. As far as I found out, the similar
debate is also ongoing in Denmark, where one of the suggestions was høn.
Just to be
clear, these debates haven’t been either easy or simple, and these new pronouns
have met a lot of criticism, mostly from linguists[5], but even inside the LGBTQ
community. If we consider that the gender neutral pronouns and languages are
not anything new[6] and
that there even existed whole societies which didn’t recognize the male-female dichotomy[7], one must wonder – why is
it so hard for people of today to accept this “new” concept?
After much thought, I came to the
conclusion that there are a few factors responsible for this lack of
understanding that intersexuals and gender neutral pronouns keep meeting in the
society. If we disregard the general conservatism, widely present and even
dominant in some societies, the first thing that comes into mind is the
language itself. As it is already known, language plays an important role in
forming one’s identity.[8]
That
explains why some people might be “protective” towards changes in their mother
tongue, but it also explains the reason some people have difficulties accepting
the third gender as a concept. As I already mentioned, there are some languages
which are based on a strict male-female system. Even though most of them do
have a third grammatical gender, neutrum, it is rarely used for living
things and would be considered derogatory if used to address an intersexual
person.
This strictly
binary gender system that lies in the core of the language naturally influences
the speakers and reflects on their perception of the world around them. Having
one such language as the mother tongue myself, I still have to think twice
before I use pronouns for people I know are intersexual. And never the less, I sometimes
make mistakes, even though I do my best not to and even though I don’t support
the binary gender system. That’s just how my brain got wired while I learned my
first words.
But I am by no means defending the people who label intersexuals as “lost”
or “confused” and these pronouns as unnecessary. My goal here was primarily to try to find one of the reasons for this problem, so that it could be taken into consideration by the
gender neutral pronouns’ advocates in the future.
(fliptalks.com) |
However, there is a big difference between
“understanding” and “accepting” something. Just because someone doesn’t
understand something and can’t relate to it, it doesn’t mean that they can’t
accept it as a social phenomenon. When it comes to religion, many of us do that
every day.
*
·
Special thanks to all of my third-gendered friends and
acquaintances, who opened my mind, confirmed my somewhat progressive ideas of
gender identities and broadened my knowledge of pronouns!
[1]
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intersexual
[2] Intersex Info Sheet (http://wgse.sa.ucsb.edu/sgd/)
[3] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/10/germany-third-gender-birth-certificate
[4] http://genderneutralpronoun.wordpress.com/
[5]
http://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/norsk-forskare-ratar-hen/
[6] Some examples are Bengali, Filipino,
Finno-Ugric languages, Korean, etc.
[7]
http://disinfo.com/2013/03/third-fourth-and-fifth-genders-in-cultures-around-the-world/
[8] Jaspal, Rusi - Language and social identity: A Psychosocial Approach (http://www.academia.edu/200226/Language_and_social_identity_a_psychosocial_approach)
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar